<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SB-600 Tests : Indoors</title>
	<atom:link href="http://paulgiunta.com/archives/2009/sb-600-tests-indoors/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://paulgiunta.com/archives/2009/sb-600-tests-indoors/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 02:32:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ilan</title>
		<link>http://paulgiunta.com/archives/2009/sb-600-tests-indoors/comment-page-1/#comment-308</link>
		<dc:creator>Ilan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2009 13:46:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paulgiunta.com/?p=1028#comment-308</guid>
		<description>The whole strobist/flash world is really confusing. I bought myself an SB600, but after using it once or twice, it just seems like too much hassle to me. 
I really need to get back to my flash bit more.. 
Glad to meet you on Twitter :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The whole strobist/flash world is really confusing. I bought myself an SB600, but after using it once or twice, it just seems like too much hassle to me.<br />
I really need to get back to my flash bit more..<br />
Glad to meet you on Twitter <img src='http://paulgiunta.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul R. Giunta</title>
		<link>http://paulgiunta.com/archives/2009/sb-600-tests-indoors/comment-page-1/#comment-305</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul R. Giunta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 17:40:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paulgiunta.com/?p=1028#comment-305</guid>
		<description>Great points!  

I was not changing the setting on the SB-600, I was changing the exposure setting of the camera and the SB-600 was responding to these changes.

You are right, I should have mentioned that the changes are seen in the DOF between the f-stops and not the exposure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great points!  </p>
<p>I was not changing the setting on the SB-600, I was changing the exposure setting of the camera and the SB-600 was responding to these changes.</p>
<p>You are right, I should have mentioned that the changes are seen in the DOF between the f-stops and not the exposure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ProPhotographer</title>
		<link>http://paulgiunta.com/archives/2009/sb-600-tests-indoors/comment-page-1/#comment-304</link>
		<dc:creator>ProPhotographer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 17:34:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paulgiunta.com/?p=1028#comment-304</guid>
		<description>Paul, 

I think you&#039;re confusing yourself here. 

This isn&#039;t really a test of flash settings as much as a test of flash TTL metering. 

The flash is adjusting it&#039;s output in TTL (or whatever Nikon&#039;s auto mode is - I&#039;m a Canon shooter!) to expose the scene. 

Taking these one by one. 

1/60th f2.8 is a little underexposed - this is confusing the issue because it should be the same illumination as f5.6 and f9  

When dealing with flash  the aperture only controls the DoF - the flash takes care of the exposure by adding or cutting off illumination to match your settings - that&#039;s why f5.6 and f9 look identical *exposure*.  You&#039;ve got even more DoF with f13 of course. But an identical exposure. 

By f18 the flashgun is running out of power to effectively expose that tiny aperture so it can&#039;t keep up - hence it underexposes.  Moreso by f22 where what you are seeing is almost all ambient (at ISO400 1/60th f22 indoors that *will* be dark). 

Put the flash on full manual power and redo the experiment.  Keep shutter at 1/60th.  You&#039;ll see how it overexposes at f2.8 and hits a sweet spot where its correct then underexposes by f22. 

PP</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paul, </p>
<p>I think you&#8217;re confusing yourself here. </p>
<p>This isn&#8217;t really a test of flash settings as much as a test of flash TTL metering. </p>
<p>The flash is adjusting it&#8217;s output in TTL (or whatever Nikon&#8217;s auto mode is &#8211; I&#8217;m a Canon shooter!) to expose the scene. </p>
<p>Taking these one by one. </p>
<p>1/60th f2.8 is a little underexposed &#8211; this is confusing the issue because it should be the same illumination as f5.6 and f9  </p>
<p>When dealing with flash  the aperture only controls the DoF &#8211; the flash takes care of the exposure by adding or cutting off illumination to match your settings &#8211; that&#8217;s why f5.6 and f9 look identical *exposure*.  You&#8217;ve got even more DoF with f13 of course. But an identical exposure. </p>
<p>By f18 the flashgun is running out of power to effectively expose that tiny aperture so it can&#8217;t keep up &#8211; hence it underexposes.  Moreso by f22 where what you are seeing is almost all ambient (at ISO400 1/60th f22 indoors that *will* be dark). </p>
<p>Put the flash on full manual power and redo the experiment.  Keep shutter at 1/60th.  You&#8217;ll see how it overexposes at f2.8 and hits a sweet spot where its correct then underexposes by f22. </p>
<p>PP</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul R. Giunta</title>
		<link>http://paulgiunta.com/archives/2009/sb-600-tests-indoors/comment-page-1/#comment-303</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul R. Giunta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 14:33:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paulgiunta.com/?p=1028#comment-303</guid>
		<description>I think that it has to do with the shutter speed being a little slow at 1/60 and f/2.8 so more flash and ambient light are getting in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that it has to do with the shutter speed being a little slow at 1/60 and f/2.8 so more flash and ambient light are getting in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LisaNewton</title>
		<link>http://paulgiunta.com/archives/2009/sb-600-tests-indoors/comment-page-1/#comment-302</link>
		<dc:creator>LisaNewton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 12:58:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paulgiunta.com/?p=1028#comment-302</guid>
		<description>You would think that the 2.8 would be lighter than the 5.6 and 9 but that doesn&#039;t look to be the case.  Do you know why that is?

Great learning series here. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You would think that the 2.8 would be lighter than the 5.6 and 9 but that doesn&#8217;t look to be the case.  Do you know why that is?</p>
<p>Great learning series here. <img src='http://paulgiunta.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
